Corporate Air Charter Pty Ltd v Australian Federation of Air Pilots [2025] FCAFC 45
Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia
Facts
No summary of facts drafted yet for this case.Issue(s)
[2] Ms Nina Pulaska was a pilot employed by the first appellant and a member of the respondent. The second appellant was the Managing Director of the first appellant. From time to time, Ms Pulaska was rostered on “stand-by duty” by the first appellant. The first issue raised by this appeal is whether that stand-by duty is work for the purposes of the Award. The second issue is whether it is paid work.
Discussion
No discussion yet for this case.Useful for
Standby duty to be paid as work under AU local law
Treaty provisions considered
No treaty provisions considered.Legislation considered
None identified.Key subjects or concepts
Local Law on Employment/Appeals history
Special leave to appeal to the High Court of Australia was refused August 7, 2025. See further https://www.hcourt.gov.au/cases-and-judgments/judgments/special-leave-dispositions/corporate-air-charter-pty-ltd-anor-v-australian-federation-air-pilots
Other case information
Lawyers or counsel before the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia:Additional case references or citations:
No additional references or citations identified for this case.
Do you have a suggestion, correction or update for this case?
