Corporate Air Charter Pty Ltd v Australian Federation of Air Pilots [2025] FCAFC 45
Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia
Facts
No summary of facts drafted yet for this case.Issue(s)
[2] Ms Nina Pulaska was a pilot employed by the first appellant and a member of the respondent. The second appellant was the Managing Director of the first appellant. From time to time, Ms Pulaska was rostered on “stand-by duty” by the first appellant. The first issue raised by this appeal is whether that stand-by duty is work for the purposes of the Award. The second issue is whether it is paid work.
